Please fill all required fields
    sta standard logo                  
  STA Server Virtualization Comparison and TCO Quick Analysis Tool  
  Compares the Costs and Benefits of Microsoft Hyper-V R2 vs. VMWare vSphere 4  
  http://www.staweb.com/ http://www.staweb.com/professional-dev.html      
  This Server Virtualization Comparison and TCO Analysis Tool compares the costs and benefits of virtualizing applications using Microsoft Windows Server 2008 (Hyper-V) vs. VMWare vSphere 4. The model provides a way to compare virtualization deployment costs and estimates the operational benefits of server virtualization.  
  This Quick Analysis requires minimal user inputs and utilizes the default assumptions built into the tool. These assumptions are provided to users but cannot be edited. The model includes Windows servers only. Soft impacts such as user productivity and revenue are not included in the model.  
  For a customized analysis, qualified prospects and customers can contact STA at 1-888-477-8246.  
  None of the personal information fields below are required, but if you would like a PDF file with your results please include your email address below and click on the "Submit" button at the bottom of the page.  
     
       
  Organization   Phone  
  Name   Email  
    Primary Location (State)
         
    Enter Information About Current Physical Servers  
(Input 1) Enter Number of Windows servers not yet virtualized (10 to 500)
     
(Input 2) What % of the above servers are likely good virtualization candidates
     
  Number of likely physical servers to include in the analysis.      
  Potential future virtualization candidates      
(Input 3) Average sever and storage useful life (3 to 5 years)
     
    Rack Blade    
(Input 4) Percent of total servers Rack vs. Blade
   
  Number of servers Rack vs. blade    
(Input 5) Percentage of existing servers using networked storage (SAN)
     
(Input 6) Annual growth in the number of applications/physical servers (100% or less)
     
    Enter Virtualization Levels and Impacts  
(Input 7) Virtualization functionality level  
 
  Note: Hyper-V with Systems Center are included in all options. Basic includes vSphere Standard and vCenter. Medium includes vSphere Enterprise and vCenter. Advanced includes vSphere Enterprise Plus, vCenter, vCenter Lifecycle Manager, vCenter AppSpeed, vCenter Chargeback, and Cisco Nexus 1000v. If the number of host servers is calculated to be 3 or less then Essentials Plus licensing is assumed and Basic level impacts will apply.    
(Input 8) Consolidation impact level    
 
  Note: Conservative assumes a baseline of 2 virtual servers per processor core. Medium assumes 3 virtual servers per core. Aggressive assumes 4 virtual servers per core. These baseline levels are used for Hyper-V. The level of consolidation with vSphere is set at 1.25 times the baseline for the Basic and Medium settings above. 1.5 time the baseline for the Advanced setting.    
(Input 9) Impact of virtualization automation tools on IT staffing costs  
 
  Note: This option allows the user to reduce or increase the impact of virtualization automation tools on IT staffing hours and costs.    
    Host Server and Consolidation Inputs  
  Type of server used as host for virtual machines   2 CPU / 4 Cores per CPU  
(Input 10) Blade or Rack Servers used for virtualization hosts?  
   
(Input 11) Add host servers or additional RAM to Hyper-V in order to match vSphere?
   
           
 
Unable to load Flash content. The Charts Control requires Flash Player 9.0.45 or higher. You can download the latest version of Flash Player from the Adobe Flash Player Download Center
     
  Results - 5 Year Total Costs    
  Cost Type Current Hyper-V vSphere   Calculated Values Hyper-V vSphere  
  Servers   Virtual Machines (VM) per core  
  Storage   VMs per core with HA/Failover  
  Network   Physical host servers  
  Energy / Space   Estimated memory per server  
  Virtualization SW   Server Consolidation Ratio (n to 1)  
  IT Staff   % increase in core consolidation with vSphere  
  Total    
  Capital and Operating Costs 5 Year Totals  
 
Unable to load Flash content. The Charts Control requires Flash Player 9.0.45 or higher. You can download the latest version of Flash Player from the Adobe Flash Player Download Center
 
    Current Hyper-V VMWare  
Capital Costs
Operating Costs
  Annual Total Costs  
 
Unable to load Flash content. The Charts Control requires Flash Player 9.0.45 or higher. You can download the latest version of Flash Player from the Adobe Flash Player Download Center
 
Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5
Current
Hyper-V
VMWare
  Physical Server Counts  
 
Unable to load Flash content. The Charts Control requires Flash Player 9.0.45 or higher. You can download the latest version of Flash Player from the Adobe Flash Player Download Center
 
Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5
Current
Hyper-V
VMWare
       
  NPV of Savings    
 
Unable to load Flash content. The Charts Control requires Flash Player 9.0.45 or higher. You can download the latest version of Flash Player from the Adobe Flash Player Download Center
   
    Hyper-V VMWare    
  NPV of Savings    
       
  Links to relevant whitepapers and useful information       Links to information about STA  
  http://www.intel.com/it/pdf/memory-sizing-for-server-virtualization.pdf     http://www.staweb.com/virtualization.html  
  http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/analysts/True_Cost_Virtual_Server_Solutions.pdf     http://www.staweb.com/our-approach.html  
  http://ctistrategy.com/2009/08/18/vmware-vsphere-microsoft-hyperv-whitepaper/     http://www.staweb.com/architecture.html  
  http://www.microsoft.com/virtualization/en/us/compare.aspx     http://www.staweb.com/solution-warranty.html
  http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmware-vsphere-crg-wp-en.pdf     http://www.staweb.com/our-community.html
  http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/Virtualization-application-based-cost-model-WP-EN.pdf     http://www.staweb.com/econ-it.html  
  Disclaimer: NOTICE - THIS INFORMATION IS PROVIDED TO YOU AS A TOOL 'AS IS' WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THERE ARE NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. STA DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. STA DOES NOT WARRANT OR MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS REGARDING THE USE, VALIDITY, ACCURACY OR RELIABILITY OF THE TOOL OR THE RESULTS OF THE USE OF THE TOOL. IN NO EVENT SHALL STA BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES, INCLUDING THOSE ARISING AS A RESULT OF STA'S NEGLIGENCE.WHETHER THOSE DAMAGES ARE DIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, OR SPECIAL, FLOWING FROM YOUR USE OF OR INABILITY TO USE THE TOOL OR INFORMATION PROVIDED HEREWITH OR RESULTS OF THE TOOL'S USE EVEN IF STA HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. THE ULTIMATE RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACHIEVING THE CALCULATED RESULTS REMAINS WITH YOU.
       
  Copyright©2010 STA, Inc. All rights reserved v 1.5.7   http://www.staweb.com/  
  sta standard logo                  
             
  Server Virtualization TCO/ROI Model      
     
       
  http://www.staweb.com/ http://www.staweb.com/virtualization.html   http://www.staweb.com/professional-dev.html  
  This model compares annual run rates of each option. Initial investments in virtualization software are included in year 1. For more information on how we can help qualified prospects and customers prepare a customized analysis please contact STA at 1-888-477-8246.  
  Option 1: As-Is with Physical Servers Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total *    
Capital Costs
Server hardware (1)
Storage network hardware (2)
Network hardware (3)
Total Capital Costs
Operating Costs
Server hardware and OS support (4)
Storage network hardware support (5)
Network hardware support (6)
Server power and cooling (7)
Datacenter floor space and facilities (8)
Server/virtualization management software 0 0 0 0 0 (9)
Server Provisioning (10)
Change Management (11)
Server Administration and Operations (12)
Total Operating Costs
Total All Costs
  Option 2: with Hyper-V and Systems Center Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total      
Capital Costs
Server hardware (13)
Storage network hardware (14)
Network hardware (15)
Total Capital Costs
% Savings from Current
Operating Costs
Server hardware and OS support (16)
Storage network hardware support (17)
Network hardware support (18)
Server power and cooling (19)
Datacenter floor space and facilities (20)
Server/virtualization management software (21)
Server Provisioning (22)
Change Management (23)
Server Administration and Operations (24)
Total Operating Costs
% Savings from Current
Total All Costs
% Savings from Current
Savings vs. Current State
NPV of Savings
  Option 3: with vSphere and vCenter Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total      
Capital Costs
Server hardware (25)
Storage network hardware (26)
Network hardware (27)
Total Capital Costs
% Savings from Current
Operating Costs
Server hardware and OS support (28)
Storage network hardware support (29)
Network hardware support (30)
Server power and cooling (31)
Datacenter floor space and facilities (32)
Server/virtualization management software (33)
Server Provisioning (34)
Change Management (35)
Server Administration and Operations (36)
Total Operating Costs
% Savings from Current
Total All Costs
% Savings from Current
Savings vs. Current State
NPV of Savings
* See "Notes and Assumptions" tab.
  Copyright©2010 STA, Inc. All rights reserved. http://www.staweb.com/index.html      
  sta standard logo        
  Notes on Total Cost Comparison      
  (1) Current server hardware costs are calculated based weighted average values from a mixture of 3 server types; 25% 1 CPU/Dual Core, 70% 2 CPU/Dual Core, and 5% 4 CPU/Quad Core. Costs are allocated over average server useful life. Annual growth in server counts is included.  
  (2) Storage costs are based on the % over servers utilizing SAN storage, average industry costs of FC HBAs($750 per unit) and switching ($5,900 per unit), 2 HBAs per server, and 24 ports per SAN switch. Growth in servers and related counts is included. Disk storage costs are not included in the analysis.  
  (3) Network costs are based on average industry costs of network switching, 2 NICs and 24 ports per switch ($3,900 per unit). Growth in servers and related counts is included.  
  (4) Annual server hardware support is set at 5% of server original cost. Annual operating system costs are based on Open License pricing of Windows 2003 Standard. This cost also includes Microsoft Systems Center and Data Protection Manager.  
  (5) Annual storage network support is set at 10% of original cost.  
  (6) Annual server network support is set at 10% of original cost.  
  (7) (7) Power usage is calculated as number of servers, times the sum of average operating and cooling watts, times the steady state constant, times the cost per kWatt hour and operating hours. Actual power represents nameplate power times nameplate to steady state power conversion. The average cost per watt of datacenter power for the selected US state. Default is the US average cost of electricity per watt hour based on Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, Electric Power Monthly, July 2008, Table 5.6A and Figure 4, "2008 Year-to-Date Average Cost per kWh", Latest Available Report can be found at: http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epm/epm.pdf. Based on weighted average of a typical Windows server mix.  
  (8) 24Us is portion of a typical 42U rack available for servers. Rack floor space estimated at 7 square feet per rack including the rack itself, plus necessary aisle and access overhead average. Datacenter space is wasted by having to spread out the racks, because racks cannot be placed closely together due to cooling constraints. This leaves 30% useable on average. Use 40% as a conservative default. Floor space required is reduced if Blade severs are selected at the Input tab.  
  (9) Not applicable to current environment since the model assumes that all current servers entered are physical servers to be virtualized.  
  (10) Includes estimated person hours per server addition (before virtualization spent on server procurement/vendor management (2hours), setup/configuration/deployment of server hardware (5 hours), installing/configuring/deploying operating system (2.5 hours), application installation/configuration/deployment (2 hours). Assumes that Microsoft Systems Center or similar management package is in use.  
  (11) Includes: Network and server administrator hours to perform each network move/add/change, setup time, change time (4 hours). Hours per operating system patch (0.3 hours). Hours per application patch and upgrade (0.3 hours). Assumes that Microsoft Systems Center or similar package is being used.  
  (12) Includes task such as: Server monitoring (6%), Break-fix management (9%), Performance & availability management (8%), Back and Recovery (5%), Administration Security management (7%), Compliance auditing/reporting (2%). Calculated as the % of total server administration FTEs based on the number of servers in the environment. The number of servers managed by 1 FTE scales up as more servers are managed due to economies of scale and management tools. Assumes that backups are managed centrally. Also assumes that Microsoft Systems Center or similar package is being used.  
  (13) Server hardware costs are calculated based on the number of physical host servers and type of server selected on the Input tab. The number of physical hosts required is calculated based on the number of virtual servers, virtual servers per core, cpus per server, and cores per CPU. Cost is also based on the amount of memory required. The amount of memory required is based on an Intel Analysis/Whitepaper titled "Memory Sizing for Server Virtualization". This model assumes that management servers are virtualized. Costs are allocated over average server useful life selected at the Input tab. Annual growth in virtual/physical server counts is included.  
  (14) Storage costs are based on the % over servers utilizing SAN storage, average industry costs of FC HBAs($750 per unit) and switching ($5,900 per unit), 2 HBAs per server, and 24 ports per SAN switch. Growth in servers and related counts is included. Incremental disk storage costs required to run the virtual servers is included in the analysis and is based on average FC SAN pricing per GB of $5.25. Costs are allocated using the server useful life value entered at the Input tab.  
  (15) Network costs are based on average industry costs of network switching, 4 NICs per server and 24 ports per switch ($3,900 per unit). Growth in servers and related counts is included. Assumes that more NICs are required for servers hosting virtual machines.  
  (16) Annual server hardware support is set at 5% of server original cost. Annual operating system costs are based on Open License pricing of Windows 2003 Standard, Enterprise or Datacenter, whichever provides the lowest cost over years.  
  (17) Annual storage network support is set at 10% of original cost.  
  (18) Annual server network support is set at 10% of original cost.  
  (19) (7) Power usage is calculated as number of physical host servers, times the sum of operating and cooling watts, times the steady state constant, times the cost per kWatt hour and operating hours. Actual power represents nameplate power times nameplate to steady state power conversion. The average cost per watt of datacenter power for the selected US state. Default is the US average cost of electricity per watt hour based on Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, Electric Power Monthly, July 2008, Table 5.6A and Figure 4, "2008 Year-to-Date Average Cost per kWh", Latest Available Report can be found at: http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epm/epm.pdf. Non-US pricing based on 2005 Worldwide Electricity Prices for Industry from Power Standards, http://www.powerstandards.com/images/PSL_World_Map_Electricity_Prices.jpg. Virtual host sever power usage is increased by 15% over non host servers due to increased CPU utilization. If Blade servers are used power usage per server is reduced by 20%.  
  (20) 24Us is portion of a typical 42U rack available for servers. Rack floor space estimated at 7 square feet per rack including the rack itself, plus necessary aisle and access overhead average. Datacenter space is wasted by having to spread out the racks, because racks cannot be placed closely together due to cooling constraints. This leaves 30% useable on average. Use 40% as a conservative default. Floor space required is reduced if Blade severs are selected at the Input tab.  
  (21) For the Hyper-V option this includes the cost of the Microsoft Systems Center Suite including Virtual Machine Manger.  
  (22) Includes estimated person hours per server addition (before virtualization spent on server procurement/vendor management (2hours), setup/configuration/deployment of server hardware (5 hours), installing/configuring/deploying operating system (2.5 hours), application installation/configuration/deployment (2 hours). Assumes that Microsoft Systems Center or similar management package is in use.  
  (23) Includes: Network and server administrator hours to perform each network move/add/change, setup time, change time (4 hours). Hours per operating system patch (0.3 hours). Hours per application patch and upgrade (0.3 hours). Assumes that Microsoft Systems Center or similar package is being used.  
  (24) Includes task such as: Server monitoring (6%), Break-fix management (9%), Performance & availability management (8%), Back and Recovery (5%), Administration Security management (7%), Compliance auditing/reporting (2%). Calculated as the % of total server administration FTEs based on the number of servers in the environment. The number of servers managed by 1 FTE scales up as more servers are managed due to economies of scale and management tools. Assumes that backups are managed centrally. Also assumes that Microsoft Systems Center or similar package is being used.  
  (25) Server hardware costs are calculated based on the number of physical host servers and type of server selected on the Input tab. The number of physical hosts required is calculated based on the number of virtual servers, virtual servers per core, cpus per server, and cores per CPU. For the vSphere option we assume that the physical hardware can host more virtual machines than with Hyper-V. There are several reasons for this assumption including: (1) Memory Oversubscription, (2) Direct Driver Model , (3) DRS with Resource Pools (4) High Performance “Gang” Scheduler, and (5) Support for Large Memory Pages and Nested Page Tables. Some industry analysts have stated that the vSphere advantage is 2 to 1. To be conservative we have used a 25% advantage in the number of VMs hosted (50% with DRS). The impact if DRS is only used if the Advanced option is selected at the Input tab. Cost is also based on the amount of memory required. The amount of memory required is based on an Intel Analysis/Whitepaper titled "Memory Sizing for Server Virtualization". The amount of memory per server is the same for Hyper-V and vSphere but the number of physical servers required with vSphere will be lower. This model assumes that management servers are virtualized. Costs are allocated over average server useful life selected at the Input tab. Annual growth in virtual/physical server counts is included.  
  (26) Storage costs are based on the % over servers utilizing SAN storage, average industry costs of FC HBAs($750 per unit) and switching ($5,900 per unit), 2 HBAs per server, and 24 ports per SAN switch. Growth in servers and related counts is included. Incremental disk storage costs required to run the virtual servers is included in the analysis and is based on average FC SAN pricing per GB of $5.25. For vSphere the amount of disk required is less due to the use of Thin Provisioning. Costs are allocated using the server useful life value entered at the Input tab.  
  (27) Network costs are based on average industry costs of network switching, 4 NICs per server and 24 ports per switch ($3,900 per unit). Growth in servers and related counts is included. Assumes that more NICs are required for servers hosting virtual machines.  
  (28) Annual server hardware support is set at 5% of server original cost. Annual operating system costs are based on Open License pricing of Windows 2003 Standard, Enterprise or Datacenter, whichever provides the lowest cost over years.  
  (29) Annual storage network support is set at 10% of original cost.  
  (30) Annual server network support is set at 10% of original cost.  
  (31) (7) Power usage is calculated as number of physical host servers, times the sum of operating and cooling watts, times the steady state constant, times the cost per kWatt hour and operating hours. Actual power represents nameplate power times nameplate to steady state power conversion. The average cost per watt of datacenter power for the selected US state. Default is the US average cost of electricity per watt hour based on Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, Electric Power Monthly, July 2008, Table 5.6A and Figure 4, "2008 Year-to-Date Average Cost per kWh", Latest Available Report can be found at: http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epm/epm.pdf. Non-US pricing based on 2005 Worldwide Electricity Prices for Industry from Power Standards, http://www.powerstandards.com/images/PSL_World_Map_Electricity_Prices.jpg. Virtual host sever power usage is increased by 15% over non host servers due to increased CPU utilization. If Blade servers are used power usage per server is reduced by 20%.  
  (32) 24Us is portion of a typical 42U rack available for servers. Rack floor space estimated at 7 square feet per rack including the rack itself, plus necessary aisle and access overhead average. Datacenter space is wasted by having to spread out the racks, because racks cannot be placed closely together due to cooling constraints. This leaves 30% useable on average. Use 40% as a conservative default. Floor space required is reduced if Blade severs are selected at the Input tab.  
  (33) For the vSphere option software cost varies depending on the "Virtualization Functionality Level" selected at the Input tab. Basic includes Standard Edition and vCenter costs at retail. Medium includes the Enterprise Edition and vCenter. Advanced includes the Enterprise Plus Edition, vCenter, vCenter AppSpeed, vCenter Lifecycle Manager, vCenter Chargeback, and Cisco Nexus 1000v. The consolidation and administration benefits of these options are also calculated.  
  (34) Includes estimated person hours per server addition (before virtualization spent on server procurement/vendor management (2hours), setup/configuration/deployment of server hardware (5 hours), installing/configuring/deploying operating system (2.5 hours), application installation/configuration/deployment (2 hours). These factors are adjusted depending on the Level of virtualization selected at the Input tab.  
  (35) Includes: Network and server administrator hours to perform each network move/add/change, setup time, change time (4 hours). Hours per operating system patch (0.3 hours). Hours per application patch and upgrade (0.3 hours). These factors are adjusted depending on the Level of virtualization selected at the Input tab.  
  (36) Includes task such as: Server monitoring (6%), Break-fix management (9%), Performance & availability management (8%), Back and Recovery (5%), Administration Security management (7%), Compliance auditing/reporting (2%). Calculated as the % of total server administration FTEs based on the number of servers in the environment. The number of servers managed by 1 FTE scales up as more servers are managed due to economies of scale and management tools. Assumes that backups are managed centrally. These factors are adjusted depending on the Level of virtualization selected at the Input tab.  
  Other Assumptions and Inputs      
  General Assumptions      
  Cost of Capital for NPV calculations 10.0%    
  Salary growth rate 3.0%    
  Annual server support as % of cost 5.0%    
  Average number of major applications per server 1.0    
  Percentage of servers which are questionable virtualization candidates    
  OS Used for Existing Servers Windows Srvr 2003 Standard    
         
  Power and Cooling      
  Steady-state constant used to convert nameplate power consumption to steady state 0.67    
  Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) for the datacenter 2.3    
  Hours per year the datacenter operates 8,766    
  Annual increase in power costs 5.0%    
  Utilization uplift to power consumption for virtualized servers 115.0%    
  Blade server power savings 20.0%    
         
  Datacenter Floor space and Facilities      
  Average size of each rack (specified in U) 24    
  Average number of square feet per rack 7.0    
  Percentage of space is currently used by racks (upward scaling factor to rack space consumption) 40%    
  Capital cost for facilities datacenter space build-out (per square foot) $ 1,000    
  Capital cost for power and cooling equipment (per square foot) $ 1,300    
  Average weighted depreciation to use for build-out and equipment (in years) 10    
  Cost for the space (lease, rent, mortgage) in square feet per year $ 35    
  Average fully burdened datacenter cost per square foot per year    
  Percentage server datacenter facilities costs increase each year 5%    
         
  Server Networked Storage      
  Network storage switch useful life 5    
  Network storage switch annual support 10%    
         
  Current Environment      
  Gigabytes (GB) of storage in current environment (in total) 100    
  Percentage of current servers attached to SAN    
  Percentage this server storage increases each year 10%    
  When a server is attached to a SAN, the number of HBAs per host 2    
  Ports per HBA 1    
  Number of ports per typical SAN switch 24    
  Cost of each FC HBA $ 750    
  Cost of each iSCSI HBA $ 250    
  Cost for FC SAN switches $ 5,900    
  Cost for iSCSI SAN switches $ 3,900    
  Cost for DAS storage (per GB) $ 2.00    
  Cost for FC SAN storage (per GB) $ 5.00    
  Cost for iSCSI SAN storage (per GB) $ 3.00    
  Cost for NAS storage (per GB) $ 3.00    
         
  Virtual Environment      
  Gigabytes (GB) of storage in current environment (in total)    
  Gigabytes (GB) of storage required for each virtual machine image - GBs 50    
  Percentage of host servers attached to SAN 100%    
  Percentage this server storage increases each year    
  When a server is attached to a SAN, the number of HBAs per host 4    
  Ports per HBA 2    
  Number of ports per typical SAN switch 24    
  Cost of each FC HBA $ 750    
  Cost of each iSCSI HBA $ 250    
  Cost for FC SAN switches $ 5,900    
  Cost for iSCSI SAN switches $ 3,900    
  Cost for DAS storage (per GB) $ 2.25    
  Cost for FC SAN storage (per GB) $ 5.25    
  Cost for iSCSI SAN storage (per GB) $ 3.25    
  Cost for NAS storage (per GB) $ 3.25    
         
  Server Network      
  Network switch useful life 5    
  Network switch annual support 10%    
         
  Current Environment      
  Network interface cards (NICs) per server 2    
  Ports per NIC 2    
  Ports per network switch 24    
  Network switch cost $ 3,900    
  On average, the percentage increase in server networking costs each year 10%    
  Percentage of the annual server networking savings that can be realized 100%    
         
  Virtual Environment      
  Network interface cards (NICs) per server 4    
  Ports per NIC 2    
  Ports per network switch 24    
  Network switch cost $ 3,900    
  On average, the percentage increase in server networking costs each year 10%    
  Percentage of the annual server networking savings that can be realized 100%    
         
  Failover/HA Factors      
  CPU overhead factor required for HA and Fault Tolerance - with vSphere 25%    
  CPU overhead factor required for HA and Fault Tolerance - with Hyper-V 25%    
  Memory overhead factor required for HA and Fault Tolerance - with vSphere 25%    
  Memory overhead factor required for HA and Fault Tolerance - with Hyper-V 25%    
         
         
  vCenter      
  Number of virtual hosts managed per vCenter Server 200    
  Additional server consolidation with vSphere vs. Hyper-V 25%    
  DRS Impact on server consolidation 5%    
         
  Other      
  Include MS System Center Data Protection Manager in VMWare Option? No    
  Include MS System Center in VMWare Option? Yes    
  Implement Systems Center Virtual Machine Manager to manage the virtualized environment? Yes    
  Management Server Type 2 CPU / 2 Cores per CPU    
  Copyright©2010 STA, Inc. All rights reserved